Home > Journals > IRESPUB Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences > Volume 3 Issue 1 > Strategies for Green Building Material Adoption in Construction Industries in Anambra State

Year Launched: 2021

Journal Menu

Strategies for Green Building Material Adoption in Construction Industries in Anambra State

Volume 3, Issue 1, May-Jun 2024    |  Page 1-11  | PDF (1MB)  |  Pub. Date: Jun 16, 2024

Author(s)

Elamah Daniel1, Ezenwata Chidozie Jovita2 & Asodike Nkiru Chigemezu2; 1Department of Building Technology, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi Edo state ; 2Department of Building Technology, Federal Polytechnic, oko

Abstract

This paper investigated the strategies for green building material adoption in construction industries in Anambra State. Three research questions guided the study. The descriptive survey research design was adopted for this study. The population of this study comprised 312 construction professionals in Anambra State. These professionals are registered Architects, Engineers, Builders and Quantity Surveyors practicing in both public and private organizations in Anambra State, Nigeria. The sample size was gotten with the formula from Morgan and Krejcie (1970) with a confidence level of 95%, and it found to be 172. Data for this study were collected by means of structured questionnaire developed by the researcher. The questionnaire is titled “Strategies for Green materials Adoption Questionnaire” (SGMAQ). The questionnaire is sub-divided into two sections; A and B. Section A contains information on the demographic profile of the respondents while section B is sub-divided into three clusters: I – III addressing the research questions. Descriptive statistics of frequency counts and percentages was employed to analyze the bio-data of the respondents while mean score was used to analyze the data to answer the research questions. The study found that construction professionals are highly aware of green building materials within the construction industry in Anambra State but the level of adoption is low. The finding also revealed that construction professionals agreed on the drivers and barriers of GBM adoption in the construction industry in Anambra State. Based on the findings, it was recommended amongst others that there should be provision of financial incentive to encourage green building uptake with adequate planning and budgetary provision should be made prior to mobilization and execution of green building construction.

Keywords

green building; construction; construction industries; awareness and adoption

Cite this paper

Daniel, E., Jovita, E. C., Chigemezu, A. N. (2024), Strategies for Green Building Material Adoption in Construction Industries in Anambra State, IRESPUB Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences. Volume 3, Issue 1, May-Jun 2024, Page 1-11

References

[1] Abdulhafeez, A. M. A. (2022). Sustainable material selection criteria framework for environmental building enhancement. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 31-44. doi: 10.12691/ajcea-10-1-5.

[2] Ahn, Y. H., Pearce, A. R., Wang, Y., & Wang, G. (2013). Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 4(1), 35-45.

[3] Aigbavboa, C., Ohiomah, I., & Zwane, T. (2017). Sustainable construction practices: A lazy view of construction professionals in the South Africa construction industry, The 8th International Conference on Applied Energy Procedia, 105, 3003–3010.

[4] Ajit, S., & Pranesh, M. R. (2017). Building materials assessment for sustainable construction based on figure of merit as a concept. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(2), 203–217.

[5] Albino, V., Balice, A. & Dangelio, R. S. (2019). Environmental strategies and green product development: An overview on sustainability driven companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(2), 83-96.

[6] Ayarkwa, J., Acheampong, A., Wiafe, F. & Boateng B. E. (2017). Factors affecting the implementation of sustainable construction in Ghana: The Architect‘s perspective. ICIDA 2017 – 6th International Conference on Infrastructure Development in Africa, 2(4), 377–386.

[7] Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Olanipekun, A. O. & Ameyaw, A. E. E. (2018). Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 1067-1079.

[8] Darko, A., Zhang, C. & Chan, A.P.C. (2017). Drivers for green building: A review of empirical studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7(6), 34-49.

[9] Glavic, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1875-1885.

[10] Greenomics. (2016). A Greenomics report finds deforestation in the supply chain of Genting Plantations, a supplier of Wilmar International.

[11] Ikechukwu, O. & Ugochukwu, I. B. (2016). Traditional building materials as a sustainable resource and material for low cost housing in Nigeria: Advantages, challenges and the way forward. Int’l Journal of Research in Chemical, Metallurgical and Civil Engg. (IJRCMCE), 3(2), 231-245.

[12] Isa, R. B. (2017). A mechanism for lean and sustainability: The case of building infrastructure in South Africa. Unpublished DTech. Thesis, Central University of Technology, South Africa.

[13] Nduka, D. O. & Ogunsanmi, O. E. (2015). Construction professionals’ perception on green building awareness and accruable benefits in construction projects in Nigeria. Covenant Journal of Research in the Built Environment (CJRBE), 3(2), 30-52.

[14] Onyeagam, O. P., Eze, E. C. & Adegboyega, A. A. (2019). Assessment of quantity surveying firms’ process and product innovation drive in Nigeria. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 2(2), 22-38.

[15] Onyegiri, I. & Ugochukwu, I. B. (2016). Traditional building materials as a sustainable resource and material for low cost housing in Nigeria: Advantages, challenges and the way forward.

[16] Rajesh, K., Vanita, A., & Surinder, M. G. (2021). Sustainable materials and techniques in affordable buildings: A case study. E3S Web of Conferences, 309, 1 – 5.

[17] Rodriguez-Nikl, T., Kelley, J., Xiao, Q., Hammer, K., & Tilt, B. (2015). Structural engineers and sustainability: An opinion survey. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 5(2), 34-53.

[18] Sheth, K. N. (2016). Sustainable building materials used in green buildings, 9th International Conference on Engineering and Business Education (ICEBE) & 6th International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ICIE), 4(3), 135-143.

[19] Srinivas, S., (2019). Green buildings – Benefits and impacts Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology.

[20] Susilawati, C. & Al-Surf, M. (2011). Challenges facing sustainable housing in Saudi Arabia: A current study showing the level of public awareness. Paper presented at the 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference Gold Coast, Australia.

[21] US DOE. (2016). US Department of Energy. Home – About Energy.gov – Mission http://energy.gov/mission (accessed October 5, 2019).

[22] Wang, N. (2014). The role of the construction industry in china’s sustainable urban development. Habitat international, 442-450.

[23] Waniko, D. P. (2014). Green building in Nigeria: Emerging opportunities for quantity surveying profession. Retrived from http://www.alive2green.com/green building.

[24] Windapo, A. O. , Albert, I. & Omopariola, E. D. (2019). Appropriate drivers for sustainable construction practices on construction sites in Nigeria. DOI:10.33796/waberconference2019.07Conference on Seeking Innovative and Sustainable African Development Solutions. construction management. Ghana, West Africa.

[25] Xue, F., Gou, Z. & Lau, S.S.Y. (2016). Human factors in green office building design: The impact of workplace green features on health perceptions in high-rise high-density Asian cities. Sustainability, 8(5), 1095-1099.